Today, the U.S.
Department of Health & Human Services Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced the resolution of a federal complaint
filed against Tennessee, one of nearly a dozen complaints filed by a coalition of national
disability advocates – the Center for Public Representation, The Arc of the
United States, Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, Autistic Self Advocacy
Network, Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund and Samuel Bagenstos — challenging
states’ plans for rationing medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic as discriminating
against people with disabilities. Medical rationing policies have
disproportionately impacted Black people with disabilities, who have higher
rates of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization. Today’s resolution sets a national precedent,
with OCR building off earlier resolutions of complaints regarding Alabama’s and
Pennsylvania’s plans and weighing in for the first time on the discriminatory
impact of a number of provisions common in many states’ rationing plans. 

The complaint against Tennessee, brought by the
coalition of national disability advocates together with Tennessee advocates
led by Disability Rights Tennessee and the Civil Rights Enforcement and
Education Center (CREEC), alleged that Tennessee’s plan illegally excluded
certain people with disabilities from accessing life-saving treatment like
ventilators based on their disabilities and deprioritized others based on their
disabilities.  In response to the
complaint and engagement with OCR, Tennessee has revised its “Guidance for the Ethical Allocation of
Scarce Resources During a Community-Wide Public Health Emergency
” to comply with federal disability
rights laws and ensure that people with disabilities are not discriminated
against even when public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic,
necessitate the rationing of scarce medical resources.

The following
are key precedent-setting changes in Tennessee’s policy to avoid discrimination
against people with disabilities: 

  • No
    Categorical Exclusions Based on Disability or Resource Intensity: 
    An
    individual can no longer be excluded from medical treatment based solely on a
    diagnosed disability or the fact that an individual might require more time or
    resources to recover because they have a disability.  This is the first time OCR has addressed
    resource intensity as a factor.  Rather
    than making assumptions about a patient’s ability to respond to treatment based
    solely on stereotypes, medical personnel must perform an individualized
    assessment of each patient based on the best objective current medical
    evidence.
  • No
    Long-Term Survivability Considerations:
    Due to this resolution,Tennessee is now the first
    state to explicitly eliminate longer-term survivability as a consideration in
    treatment decisions, changing its Guidance to allow medical personnel to
    consider only “imminence of mortality.” Survivability is a factor that can be
    fraught with speculation, mistaken stereotypes, and assumptions about the
    quality of life and lifespan of people with disabilities.
  • Reasonable
    Modifications Required:
    Tennessee’s
    Guidance now requires hospitals to make reasonable modifications to the
    Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)—the tool used to prioritize access
    to medical treatment—to avoid penalizing people with underlying conditions that
    are unrelated to their ability to benefit from treatment. This is the first
    time OCR has weighed in on modifications to assessment tools. It also requires
    hospitals and other long-term care facilities (such as nursing homes) to
    reasonably modify no-visitor policies when necessary to ensure equal access to
    care.
  • Reallocation of Personal Ventilators
    Prohibited
    : Medical
    personnel may not reallocate the personal ventilator of a patient who uses a
    ventilator in their daily life to another patient whom the personnel deem more
    likely to benefit from the ventilator in receiving treatment. This is the first
    OCR resolution addressing this issue.  

“Today’s OCR
resolution makes clear that policies common in many states’ medical rationing
plans – such as denying care based on the belief that disabled people take
longer to recover or by using tools that penalize people for having
disabilities that do not impact their ability to survive COVID19 – constitute
illegal disability discrimination,” said Alison Barkoff, Director of Advocacy
at the Center for Public Representation. 
“We hope that states will revisit their policies in light of today’s
resolution.” 

“This
resolution makes major progress toward ensuring that people with disabilities have
equal access to the care and tools necessary to fight COVID-19 infection,” said
Shira Wakschlag, Director of Legal Advocacy and General Counsel at The Arc. “We
are grateful to OCR for continuing to recognize the rights of people with
disabilities during this pandemic and we will keep fighting for revisions to discriminatory
policies that could mean the difference between life and death for people with
disabilities.”

In addition to
filing complaints with OCR, the national disability organizations have created
resources to assist to assist stakeholders across the country in evaluating and
advocating for non-discriminatory medical rationing plans at Center for Public Representation and The Arc

For more information about today’s resolution,
contact:

Alison Barkoff, Center for Public Representation

abarkoff@cpr-us.org or 202-841-7562

Kristin Wright, The Arc of the United States

wright@thearc.org or 202-617-3271

Martie Lafferty, Civil Rights Education and Enforcement Center

mlafferty@creeclaw.org or 615- 913-5099

The post Resolution of Federal Civil Rights Complaint Raises the Bar in Prohibiting Medical Discrimination Against People With Disabilities During COVID-19 Pandemic appeared first on The Arc.

18 thoughts on “Resolution of Federal Civil Rights Complaint Raises the Bar in Prohibiting Medical Discrimination Against People With Disabilities During COVID-19 Pandemic

  1. Very good article! We are linking to this particularly great content on our site. Keep up the great writing.

  2. I am the manager of JustCBD Store company (justcbdstore.com) and I’m presently planning to expand my wholesale side of business. It would be great if anybody at targetdomain share some guidance . I considered that the most suitable way to accomplish this would be to reach out to vape companies and cbd retailers. I was hoping if anyone could recommend a reputable web-site where I can buy Vape Shop B2B Direct Mail List I am already considering creativebeartech.com, theeliquidboutique.co.uk and wowitloveithaveit.com. Not sure which one would be the best option and would appreciate any assistance on this. Or would it be easier for me to scrape my own leads? Ideas?

  3. Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It will always be interesting to read articles from other authors and use something from other sites.

  4. Howdy! This blog post could not be written much better! Reading through this post reminds me of my previous roommate! He continually kept talking about this. I will forward this post to him. Fairly certain he will have a very good read. Many thanks for sharing!

  5. I have to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing this site. I’m hoping to see the same high-grade blog posts by you later on as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has inspired me to get my own, personal site now 😉

  6. You made some respectable factors there. I looked on the web for the problem and located most individuals will go together with with your website.

  7. I wanted to compose a remark in order to thank you for all of the amazing advice you are showing at this site. My prolonged internet search has finally been recognized with high-quality suggestions to talk about with my family members. I would state that that most of us site visitors are very fortunate to live in a remarkable website with many brilliant people with valuable basics. I feel extremely privileged to have discovered your web pages and look forward to so many more awesome minutes reading here. Thanks a lot once more for a lot of things.

  8. My husband and i have been now contented when Michael managed to carry out his research with the precious recommendations he received using your site. It’s not at all simplistic to simply choose to be making a gift of information and facts which other people might have been making money from. We realize we need you to appreciate for that. Most of the explanations you’ve made, the straightforward site navigation, the relationships you help create – it’s all extraordinary, and it’s really aiding our son in addition to our family imagine that the matter is enjoyable, which is highly essential. Thank you for all the pieces!

  9. I am glad for writing to let you be aware of of the wonderful discovery our daughter had using the blog. She came to understand such a lot of pieces, not to mention what it’s like to possess an ideal helping mood to let a number of people smoothly know various advanced matters. You really did more than our own expected results. Thanks for presenting those beneficial, safe, edifying and as well as fun tips on this topic to Sandra.

  10. You are so interesting! I do not suppose I’ve read anything like this before. So great to find another person with some unique thoughts on this issue. Seriously.. thanks for starting this up. This website is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.